中文圣经

All 66 Bible Books Ranked by Difficulty

Answering: “Bible books ranked by Chinese difficulty

Updated 2026-09-22 · plain text · JSON

One table, every book, with the numbers behind the ordering. The formula is fixed and printed here so the ranking can be checked or disagreed with: share of word tokens at HSK 1-3, tie-broken by distinct characters per 1,000 characters of text.

Read it as a reading order rather than a verdict. Working down from the top means meeting new vocabulary at the slowest rate; the spread between the easiest and hardest book is 22.6 percentage points, which in practice is the difference between one unknown word a verse and three.

Each row links to that book's own profile, which adds its distinct-word count, its reading time, its most frequent words and the words that occur in it and nowhere else.

All 66 books, easiest first
RankBookHSK 1-3CharactersDistinct charsDistinct wordsMinutes
1John72.3%23,6431,0111,64791
2Matthew68.1%27,9831,4152,475108
32 John67.9%3931511382
4Mark67.8%17,4971,2271,93367
51 John67.8%3,21833039512
6Luke67.7%30,4951,4932,749117
7Revelation65.1%13,4871,0681,55552
8James64.9%3,07263570712
92 Corinthians64.3%8,0578271,16531
102 Thessalonians63.8%1,4153613605
11Genesis63.7%44,6261,5022,781172
12Song of Solomon63.7%3,42668074113
133 John63.7%4191711602
14Acts63.2%28,9331,3772,628111
151 Corinthians62.9%12,2629541,45347
161 Thessalonians61.9%2,62348353410
17Philemon61.8%6012262102
18Galatians61.7%4,18260575716
19Ruth61.7%2,95648455411
20Exodus61.5%35,1771,4152,395135
21Jonah61.5%1,4504113936
22Psalms61.4%53,9041,7473,490207
23Deuteronomy61.2%31,4481,4412,385121
24Ecclesiastes61.2%6,1568411,13724
25Colossians61.2%2,83555862811
26Philippians61.1%2,97054964211
27Hebrews60.5%8,9269761,44034
28Ezekiel60.3%42,9831,5942,874165
29Job59.7%20,8571,5742,72280
30Ephesians59.5%3,93864580015
31Judges59.2%21,6621,2421,91183
32Romans59.1%12,2529711,50447
33Lamentations59%4,08179790316
34Leviticus58.9%25,5981,0941,62698
352 Timothy58.8%2,2805696159
36Jude58.6%8973573173
372 Peter58.5%2,0705155728
38Jeremiah58.3%50,5861,6783,139195
39Zechariah58.1%7,1589261,16228
40Numbers57.9%36,7091,3022,169141
41Joshua57.7%22,6291,0261,58387
421 Samuel57.7%28,4331,3282,215109
43Malachi57.6%2,3105084999
441 Kings57.1%26,8601,3122,182103
45Isaiah56.9%43,6511,9043,754168
46Daniel56.8%12,5391,0931,62948
47Haggai56.8%1,2853313125
481 Timothy56.7%3,07562976112
492 Samuel56.2%23,4111,3322,15790
50Titus56.1%1,2994164235
511 Peter56%3,31565375713
52Joel55.5%2,2595825889
532 Kings55.3%26,1801,2832,095101
54Micah54.9%3,71278689014
55Esther54.8%5,85872490723
56Amos54.5%4,80986098218
57Habakkuk54.5%1,6575725626
58Nehemiah54.4%12,7131,0391,48349
59Hosea53.7%6,3899491,16725
60Zephaniah53.7%1,9395325147
61Proverbs52.5%16,9731,4412,33565
622 Chronicles51.7%29,4691,3792,371113
63Obadiah51.4%7482772413
64Nahum51.3%1,4865695376
65Ezra50.8%8,7548471,14434
661 Chronicles49.7%26,1711,1931,864101

Questions

Is this a readability score?
No. It is one stated formula over vocabulary frequency, not a validated readability index, and it says nothing about grammar or subject matter.
Would a different HSK band change the order?
Somewhat. The ordering uses HSK 1-3; a reader at HSK 6 would find the differences smaller, since HSK 6 covers 71.4% of the text overall.
Can I sort by length instead?
The character column does that: the shortest books are 2 John, 3 John, Philemon.

Related reference pages

Take it further

How these numbers were produced

  • Text: 和合本 (Chinese Union Version), simplified script — public domain66 books, 1,189 chapters, 31,021 verses.
  • Words: forward maximum matching against CC-CEDICT (this site's own segmentation). A different segmenter gives slightly different word counts; character counts are unaffected.
  • HSK levels: HSK 3.0 levels from the complete-hsk-vocabulary list; band 7 covers HSK 7-9.
  • Reading times: 260 characters a minute — an assumption about a fluent adult reader, not a measurement.
  • Computed: 2026-09-22, from the text on this site.

These are counts anyone can reproduce from the published dataset. They are not a peer-reviewed linguistic study, and the difficulty rankings are one stated formula rather than a validated readability score.

Definitions: CC-CEDICT, licensed CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). If you share this file onward, keep this notice and share alike. Character data: Make Me a Hanzi (Arphic Public License / LGPL).