中文圣经

All 66 Bible Books Ranked by Difficulty

Answering: “Bible books ranked by Chinese difficulty”

Updated 2026-09-26 · plain text · JSON

One table, every book, with the numbers behind the ordering. The formula is fixed and printed here so the ranking can be checked or disagreed with: share of word tokens at HSK 1-3, tie-broken by distinct characters per 1,000 characters of text.

Read it as a reading order rather than a verdict. Working down from the top means meeting new vocabulary at the slowest rate; the spread between the easiest and hardest book is 21.5 percentage points, which in practice is the difference between one unknown word a verse and three.

Each row links to that book's own profile, which adds its distinct-word count, its reading time, its most frequent words and the words that occur in it and nowhere else.

All 66 books, easiest first
RankBookHSK 1-3CharactersDistinct charsDistinct wordsMinutes
1John72.7%23,6431,0111,62691
2Matthew68.6%27,9831,4152,461108
3Mark68.4%17,4971,2271,91767
4Luke68.2%30,4951,4932,731117
52 John68%3931511372
61 John67.9%3,21833039412
7Revelation65.7%13,4871,0681,54552
8James65.3%3,07263570512
9Genesis65.1%44,6261,5022,848172
102 Corinthians64.4%8,0578271,15531
11Song of Solomon64.1%3,42668073513
122 Thessalonians64%1,4153613585
13Acts63.9%28,9331,3772,643111
143 John63.9%4191711572
15Ruth63.2%2,95648454611
161 Corinthians63%12,2629541,43647
17Philemon62.2%6012262042
18Exodus61.9%35,1771,4152,394135
19Deuteronomy61.9%31,4481,4412,393121
201 Thessalonians61.9%2,62348353410
21Psalms61.8%53,9041,7473,469207
22Galatians61.8%4,18260574616
23Jonah61.6%1,4504113936
24Ecclesiastes61.5%6,1568411,13024
25Colossians61.4%2,83555861911
26Philippians61.3%2,97054963711
27Hebrews61%8,9269761,43434
28Ezekiel60.8%42,9831,5942,877165
29Judges60.6%21,6621,2421,93683
30Job60%20,8571,5742,71780
31Romans59.5%12,2529711,49447
32Ephesians59.5%3,93864579515
33Jeremiah59.2%50,5861,6783,177195
34Leviticus59.2%25,5981,0941,61298
35Lamentations59.2%4,08179789816
361 Samuel59.1%28,4331,3282,239109
37Joshua59%22,6291,0261,67887
38Numbers58.9%36,7091,3022,220141
39Jude58.9%8973573133
402 Timothy58.7%2,2805696169
41Zechariah58.6%7,1589261,15628
422 Peter58.5%2,0705155718
431 Kings58.2%26,8601,3122,208103
44Malachi58.1%2,3105084969
45Daniel57.6%12,5391,0931,62048
46Isaiah57.5%43,6511,9043,788168
472 Samuel57.5%23,4111,3322,20290
481 Timothy56.9%3,07562975712
492 Kings56.8%26,1801,2832,114101
50Haggai56.8%1,2853313085
51Nehemiah56.4%12,7131,0391,57149
52Titus56.3%1,2994164205
53Esther56%5,85872490623
541 Peter56%3,31565374913
55Amos55.9%4,80986097318
56Micah55.9%3,71278688214
57Joel55.7%2,2595825849
58Habakkuk54.7%1,6575725616
59Zephaniah54.5%1,9395325107
60Hosea54.4%6,3899491,16025
61Obadiah54.1%7482772323
622 Chronicles53%29,4691,3792,420113
63Ezra53%8,7548471,19634
64Proverbs52.9%16,9731,4412,32065
651 Chronicles51.8%26,1711,1932,140101
66Nahum51.2%1,4865695326

Questions

Is this a readability score?
No. It is one stated formula over vocabulary frequency, not a validated readability index, and it says nothing about grammar or subject matter.
Would a different HSK band change the order?
Somewhat. The ordering uses HSK 1-3; a reader at HSK 6 would find the differences smaller, since HSK 6 covers 72% of the text overall.
Can I sort by length instead?
The character column does that: the shortest books are 2 John, 3 John, Philemon.

Related reference pages

Take it further

How these numbers were produced

  • Text: 和合本 (Chinese Union Version), simplified script — public domain — 66 books, 1,189 chapters, 31,021 verses.
  • Words: forward maximum matching against CC-CEDICT (this site's own segmentation). A different segmenter gives slightly different word counts; character counts are unaffected.
  • HSK levels: HSK 3.0 levels from the complete-hsk-vocabulary list; band 7 covers HSK 7-9.
  • Reading times: 260 characters a minute — an assumption about a fluent adult reader, not a measurement.
  • Computed: 2026-09-26, from the text on this site.

These are counts anyone can reproduce from the published dataset. They are not a peer-reviewed linguistic study, and the difficulty rankings are one stated formula rather than a validated readability score.

Definitions: CC-CEDICT, licensed CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). If you share this file onward, keep this notice and share alike. Character data: Make Me a Hanzi (Arphic Public License / LGPL).